Monday, October 5, 2009

Should Congress Investigate?

A new Inspector General report about the first government bank bailout in 2008 finds that then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and other officials were wrong in declaring that all nine banks receiving the first round of bailout support -- $125 billion -- were sound. Should Congress hold hearings to investigate these findings?

Should Congress hold hearings on the Inspector General's report?

- Yes. They deceived taxpayers and lawmakers, and we need to know more.
- No. The Office of Inspector General should expand its investigation, not Congress.
- No. It was an unprecedented situation in America's history and it's behind us now - move on.
- I'm not sure.

 VOTE HERE and SEE the results! 

5 comments:

  1. Who are the morons that voted for congress to hold hearings?
    Don't they realize who got us into this mess?

    and who in this world could guess if a business is sound or not?
    Just ask the current admin, they don't have a clue either.
    Lat

    ReplyDelete
  2. ...yup, Lat. All clueless! Thanks for the stop-by.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I thought you were gone and then began looking at your blog better and see that you are still posting here. I imagine most are not seeing you here either.

    Things just keep getting crazier and crazier with this Administration.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Umm, I think Henry Paulson was Treasury Secretary during the LAST administration. The only thing crazy is you people.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous, you just like to cause trouble, don't you? Must have a little prick - you're all alike! LOL. Really, no one here, wants to hear your crap. Go back over to the FBI-loving blog and stay there! You're not welcome here!

    ReplyDelete